Skip to content
A mountaineer with a backpack stands on a snowy mountain ridge during sunrise.

An in-depth look at the lower middle market

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Tree Line is pleased to present the first annual Ascend Report, which provides insight into the state of the lower middle market (“LMM”). We begin by providing a broad overview of the LMM, including market sizing statistics, historical growth and commentary regarding the proliferation of sophisticated private equity sponsors that have entered the LMM. Managers have proven buy and build platforms can successfully capture multiple arbitrage which has heightened attention to the LMM opportunity set. As a result, many firms have been launched in the LMM by seasoned private equity professionals from reputable, middle market sponsors, which has brought a level of sophistication to the LMM that did not previously exist. Adding to the market’s sophistication is emergence of data-driven analysis helped by various new research platforms which provide for insightful takeaways on sector performance.

Following the market overview, we provide a summary of the survey of 60 LMM private equity managers recently conducted by the Tree Line team.  Managers provided feedback on deal activity, deployment expectations and sector focus. Overwhelmingly, participants noted robust activity expectations over the next 12 months with certain identified shifts in investment strategy. The data from the Ascend Survey is extremely valuable and we are grateful to our sponsor relationships for participating.

We conclude the Ascend Report with a summary of how the examined trends within the LMM have influenced Tree Line’s own investment outlook.  We discuss our own findings in historical borrower sizing, valuations, use of add-on financing and sector focus. 2020 will prove to be a defining year for all investors in the LMM.  Despite today’s challenges, we believe we are entering one of the most attractive investment vintages on record.  Now more than ever, market awareness and data are paramount to portfolio construction.  We will continue to mine our data set of thousands reviewed opportunities for critical perspectives for the benefit of our investors, borrowers and private equity partners.

Tree Line Contributing Team

Tom Quimby

Tom Quimby

Frank Cupido

Frank Cupido, CFA

Cole Rademacher

Cole Rademacher

Report contents: 1, The LMM: The Lower Middle Market (page 3), Buy & Build Trends (5), Sponsor Spin-Outs (6), LMM Sector Performance Database (7). 2, Sponsor Survey: 2020 Ascend Survey (12). 3, Tree Line's Observations: Tree Line's Observations & Market Insights (23), Industry Trends (26).

THE LOWER MIDDLE MARKET

A blue semi-truck driving down a highway during the day.
Lower Middle Market: Tree Line defines the LMM as companies with $2M to $20M of EBITDA, which translates to revenues of about $10M to $100M. Private equity firms targeting LMM companies typically raise funds up to $500M. The LMM has been growing rapidly, as there is a significant addressable set of acquisition targets and opportunities for sponsors to drive value through attractive valuations and buy-and-build strategies.
Growth drivers: 175,000 companies with revenue between $10M and $100M. 713 LMM private equity funds ($50M to $500M fund sizes) have been raised in the last five years.
Chart: Private equity LMM deal activity, 2006 to 2019. Deal value in billions and number of deals closed: 2006 $29.5B, 645 deals; 2007 $34.9B, 815; 2008 $38.7B, 730; 2009 $17.5B, 427; 2010 $23.3B, 566; 2011 $25.8B, 636; 2012 $36.5B, 955; 2013 $29.0B, 717; 2014 $35.3B, 801; 2015 $38.0B, 942; 2016 $42.8B, 1,040; 2017 $46.8B, 1,049; 2018 $44.9B, 1,145; 2019 $48.3B, 1,207.

Buy and Builds Driving Activity

Add-on acquisitions are core to the buy and build thesis which have driven significant activity in the lower middle market

Chart: Tree Line portfolio buy and build examples, EV/EBITDA multiples (initial platform, average add-on, resultant blended, exit). Platform 1: 9.1x, 6.0x, 7.9x, 10.0x. Platform 2: 9.4x, 7.4x, 7.5x, 9.0x. Platform 3: 8.0x, 6.6x, 6.9x, 8.5x. Platform 4: 6.5x, 5.2x, 5.6x, 9.0x.

Buy and Builds within Tree Line’s portfolio have generated ~2x multiple expansion for LMM sponsors

LMM Sponsor Growth from Spin-outs

Seasoned private equity professionals have departed upper middle market and middle market private equity funds to form lower middle market spin-offs, bringing a level of sophistication to the lower middle market that previously did not exist. Since 2017, over 50 such firms have launched.  These LMM firms have raised unprecedented amounts of capital5.

Over the past five years, private equity firms with fund sizes of $50M – $500M have raised over $155B6.

Sector Performance Database

In addition to the increasing presence of experienced large-market sponsors now transacting in the LMM, the LMM’s overall sophistication has improved driven by availability of data.

Tree Line maintains a database of > 1,000 borrowers from public BDC filings to monitor the probability of default by sector.

Probability of markdown by sector: cyclical and discretionary industries (energy, metals and mining, and consumer) exhibited the highest probability of markdown. As of Q1 2020, bad deals out of total deals: Energy 37 of 100 (37.0%); Metals and Mining 4 of 12 (33.3%); Consumer 100 of 385 (26.0%); Hotel, Gaming, Leisure 9 of 42 (21.4%); Healthcare 65 of 357 (18.2%); Environmental Services 4 of 22 (18.2%); Manufacturing 58 of 330 (17.6%); Telecommunications 9 of 58 (15.5%).

Sector: Consumer

Bar chart of consumer deals by subsector. Services: site based 13, education 10, consumer finance 6, home services 5, online marketplace 3, airline 2, transportation 2. Retail: clothing retail 10, electronics 3, home goods 2, groceries 1, ecommerce 1. Consumer products: household products 4, early childhood 4, miscellaneous 4, fashion and jewelry 4, electronics 3, furniture 3, sports equipment 3, natural supplements 3, food 2, cosmetics 1.
  • Site-based (12 fast food / fast casual Restaurants and 1 gym) comprised the largest sub-sector of consumer at 13% of total consumer deals. Site-based reported an average mark (FMV/Cost) of 26%.
  • Clothing retail, representing 10% of consumer, was the second worst performing sub-sector of consumer with an average mark of 36%. Overall retail comprised 22% of consumer and had an average mark of 47%.
  • Of the 10 education deals, 5 were Higher Education and 4 were Online Education. Education deals had an average mark of 17%.

Sector: Healthcare

Bar chart of healthcare deals by subsector: pharma/biopharma/biotech 25, medical devices 13, physician practice management 12, medical labs 3, rehabilitation center 3, drug testing 3, behavioral health 2, home health provider 2, insurance 2, revenue cycle management 1, drug manufacturing 1.
  • Pharma and biotech was the largest sub-sector in healthcare, reporting 25 bad deals or 38% of the category. 72% of these were equity deals with relatively small nominal dollars of amortized cost (<$3M). Deals in the space had an average mark of 38%.
  • Medical device companies (primarily instrumentation vs. durable medical equipment) represented a meaningful portion of healthcare deals as well at an average mark of 63%.
  • Of the 12 deals in the Physician Practice Management (“PPM”) space, 4 were dental deals with an average mark of 58%. The sub-sector also included two dermatology deals and two hospital deals.

Sector: Manufacturing

Bar chart of manufacturing deals by subsector: contract manufacturer 18, automotive 10, building products 6, chemicals 6, aerospace and defense 5, machine tools 3, glass fabrication 2, paper and packaging 2, agricultural equipment 1.
  • Contract manufacturers serving a broad range of end markets were the largest contributor in the broader manufacturing category. The average mark for these deals was 47%.
  • Automotive comprised the second largest category within Manufacturing at 10 deals and had an average mark of 61%.

BDCs Sidelined

Valuation and performance issues at LMM BDC managers driven by COVID has shifted industry valuations well below NAV, limiting future equity issuance.

Chart: LMM BDC change in price to NAV, from 0.86x in Q2 2019 to 0.60x in Q2 2020.

Dislocation Impact

COVID exposed many lenders carrying too much risk via elevated leverage with weak documentation in cov-lite deals, or too little liquidity driven by poor management of unfunded commitments.  This dislocation has created a significant opportunity for healthy lenders with available capital.

2020 ASCEND SURVEY

Aerial view of people sitting in individual white circles painted on a green lawn.

60 PRIVATE EQUITY SPONSORS CONTRIBUTED THE FINDINGS OF THE FIRST ANNUAL ASCEND SURVEY.

What type of economic recovery are you projecting?

Chart of expected recovery shapes: swoosh-shaped 43%, U-shaped 20%, W-shaped 17%, V-shaped 15%, L-shaped 5%.

Do you expect to deploy more, less or the same amount of capital in the next 12 months compared to previous plans?

Survey chart, capital to deploy in the next 12 months compared to previous plans: same, about 47%; more, about 33%; less, about 20%.

Do you expect more, less or the same amount of capital to be allocated to add-ons?

Survey chart, capital allocated to add-ons: same, about 57%; more, about 40%; less, about 3%.

When do you expect new platform acquisition activity to continue?

Survey chart, when new platform acquisition activity will continue: currently active, about 47%; Q3 2020, about 12%; Q4 2020, about 25%; 2021 and beyond, about 15%.

When do you expect add-on acquisition activity to continue?

Survey chart, when add-on acquisition activity will continue: currently active, about 80%; Q3 2020, about 18%; Q4 2020, none; 2021 and beyond, about 2%.

Will you invest in businesses that could be impacted by a second wave or future shelter in place mandates?

Survey pie chart, willingness to invest in businesses that could be affected by a second wave or future shelter-in-place mandates: yes, about 62%; no, about 38%.

Will you seek distressed opportunities post-COVID-19?

Survey chart, seeking distressed opportunities after COVID-19: unsure, about 37%; no, about 35%; yes, about 28%.

What is your top concern in the current environment for a new platform?

Survey chart, top concern for a new platform: ability to withstand a second wave, about 43%; shifting supply chain and end-market risk, about 28%; availability of debt, about 15%; performance during shelter in place, about 13%.

Do you expect your target market of opportunities will expand, shrink or remain the same?

  • Expand: 45%
  • Shrink: 30%
  • Remain the Same: 25%

Other than industries materially impacted by COVID-19 or a recession, do you expect EV multiples to increase, decrease or remain the same?

  • Expand: 10%
  • Shrink: 45%
  • Remain the Same: 45%

Will your fundraising plans change as a result of COVID-19?

Survey donut chart, change to fundraising plans because of COVID-19: no, will stay on plan, about 88%; yes, will raise additional capital to capture opportunity, about 7%; yes, will suspend fundraising for 2020, about 5%.

Do you expect to move up market, down market or remain focused on the same market?

Survey chart, market focus: focus on the same market, about 91%; move up market, about 6%; move down market, about 1%.

Over the next 12 months, do you expect LMM M&A activity (companies with <$15M of EBITDA) to be more or less active compared to the prior 12 months?

Survey chart, expected LMM M&A activity over the next 12 months compared to the prior 12 months: less, about 63%; more, about 25%; similar level, about 12%.

Sponsors noted their process and strategy is expected to shift as a result of COVID…

93% expect video conferencing to play a bigger role in their diligence efforts

90% expect video conferencing play a bigger role in their portfolio management efforts

25% expect their investment strategy shift to focus on companies that have the ability to work remotely

5% expect their geographic focus change due to potential travel challenges

Survey chart, when sponsors expect to travel: currently traveling 32%, Q3 2020 32%, Q4 2020 13%, 2021 23%.

What is your preferred debt structure?

Survey donut chart, preferred debt structure: unitranche (bank and private debt), about 35%; senior/mezzanine, about 25%; senior flexible private debt only, about 25%; senior bank debt only, about 15%.

Post-COVID-19, do you expect to use more, less or the same amount of leverage?

Survey chart, leverage after COVID-19: same, about 63%; less, about 35%; more, about 2%.

Rank the most important factor when selecting a lender:

Survey chart, most important factor when selecting a lender: flexibility, about 63%; existing relationship, about 23%; price, about 8%; ability to grow, about 5%.

Targeted industries pre-COVID-19 (% of respondents that focus on each sector):

Survey chart, targeted industries before COVID-19 (share of respondents, approximate): business services 72%, healthcare 56%, tech-enabled services 54%, industrials 51%, consumer services 37%, software 33%, transportation and logistics 30%, aerospace and defense 28%, consumer goods 26%, food and beverage 25%, construction and building 14%, financial services 10%, automotive 7%, oil and gas 7%, restaurants 7%, retail 5%.

Targeted industries post-COVID-19 (% change vs. pre-COVID levels):

Survey chart, change in targeted industries after COVID-19 versus before (approximate): financial services up 2%, healthcare up 1%, software up 0.5%; automotive and construction about flat; transportation and logistics down 6.5%, aerospace and defense, consumer goods and consumer services each down about 5%, oil and gas and restaurants down 3.5%, business services and retail down 2%, food and beverage, industrials and tech-enabled services down about 1%.

Industries to avoid pre-COVID-19 (% of respondents that focus on each sector):

Survey chart, industries to avoid before COVID-19 (share of respondents, approximate): oil and gas 85%, retail 73%, restaurants 71%, automotive 47%, construction and building 47%, consumer goods 33%, food and beverage 24%, financial services 22%, aerospace and defense 18%, consumer services 18%, software 18%, healthcare 11%, transportation and logistics 11%, business services 4%, industrials 4%, tech-enabled services 2%.

Industries to avoid post-COVID-19 (% change vs. pre-COVID levels):

Survey chart, change in industries to avoid after COVID-19 versus before (approximate): consumer goods up 6.5%, financial services up 4.5%, healthcare, industrials and software up 2%; aerospace and defense down 11%, consumer services and oil and gas down 4%, automotive and restaurants down 2%; the rest unchanged.

TREE LINE INSIGHTS

A line of hikers in silhouette ascends a steep, foggy mountain ridge.
Tree Line's market insights: over the past six years, Tree Line has built processes and systems to track deal flow data and market trends, which are included on the following pages. Our proprietary data provides an inside look into trends affecting the equity and credit markets.
Over 3,000 deals reviewed by Tree Line's deal teams since inception in 2014. Tree Line has invested over $1.4B of capital across 58 platforms and 53 add-ons.

DOUBLE DIGIT PURCHASE MULTIPLES ARE DRIVING SPONSORS DOWN MARKET WHERE BETTER VALUE CAN BE FOUND AND GROWN VIA ADD-ONS

US Private Equity Buyout EV/EBITDA multiples have increased from 10.0x in 2015 to 12.7x in 20198

Chart: US private equity buyout EV/EBITDA multiples by year: 2014 12.8x, 2015 10.0x, 2016 10.5x, 2017 12.2x, 2018 11.5x, 2019 12.7x.

Leading to sponsors evaluate smaller platforms. Average EBITDA for Tree Line’s new deal opportunities decreased from $12.7M in 2014 to $6.9M in 2018 with a rebound to $9.1M in 2019.

Chart: Tree Line's average EBITDA request, in millions: 2014 $12.7, 2015 $9.5, 2016 $7.1, 2017 $7.3, 2018 $6.9, 2019 $9.1.

Given the move down market, sponsors have targeted growth through add-ons acquisitions, which has grown from 0% of Tree Line’s invested capital in 2014 to 35% in 2019.

Chart: Tree Line's invested capital mix, share going to add-ons: 2014 0%, 2015 15%, 2016 5%, 2017 16%, 2018 20%, 2019 35%; the rest is mostly platform investments, with a small share of other.

WITH AN EYE ON BUSINESSES WITH THE LOWEST PROBABILITY OF DEFAULT, TREE LINE’S PORTFOLIO CONSTRUCTION FOCUSES ON BUSINESS SERVICES AND TECH-ENABLED SERVICES INDUSTRIES.

Deals marked below 80% as of Q1 2020, probability of markdown by sector (bad deals out of total deals): Energy 37 of 100 (37.0%); Metals and Mining 4 of 12 (33.3%); Consumer 100 of 385 (26.0%); Hotel, Gaming, Leisure 9 of 42 (21.4%); Healthcare 65 of 357 (18.2%).
Chart: Tree Line's invested capital by industry in 2017, 2018 and 2019 (approximate): manufacturing 15%, 19%, 3%; business services 13%, 22%, 32%; consumer related 31%, 23%, 18%; healthcare 14%, 13%, 21%; tech-enabled services 13%, 2%, 25%; transportation 14%, 21%, 2%. It shows an intentional shift away from consumer products and services to business services and tech-enabled services.

CONCLUSIONS…

To the readers:

We could never have scripted the events that would take place in the early months of 2020. The first half of the year has confronted us with a pandemic and demands for social reform, alongside a trade war, reflation, and a significant shift in how we work, commute, travel, shop and interact as human beings. Billions of lives around the globe have been impacted by these events in profound ways.

Despite today’s challenges, we continue to believe that the LMM provides an attractive opportunity set for private credit investors. Our market is as sophisticated as it has ever been driven by increasing presence of experienced investors who are seeking to tap the advantages in our market and a wealth of accessible performance data. We’re pleased, but not surprised, to see that our private equity partners expect to remain active in this challenging climate. This is clearly shown in the Ascend survey which noted that 80% of sponsors expect to deploy the same or more capital in the next twelve months as compared to the previous twelve months.

At Tree Line, we will maintain a cautious but proven portfolio construction strategy focused on directly originated, senior secured, modestly levered, high free cash flow, sponsor-backed loans. This strategy has placed us in as strong of a position as possible entering the crisis and we are expecting a very attractive vintage going forward.

Our team has gained invaluable perspective through these trying times. In addition to our efforts to lead the LMM in market awareness through our research and data, we are also proud of our impact on our community through our 1% for the Planet initiative and giving during COVID. We will continue to strive to be a leader in the LMM for the benefit of our investors, borrowers, private equity partners and communities.

Best Regards,

The Tree Line Team

Disclaimer & Footnotes

Disclaimer

Opinions expressed in this Ascend Report are those of Tree Line Capital Partners, LLC as of August 2020 and are subject to change. Furthermore, the data contained herein is for informational and discussion purposes only and is neither an offer to sell nor a solicitation of any offer to buy any securities, investment product, or investment advisory services.

Footnotes

  1. Source: 2012 US Census: 2012 SUSB Annual Data Tables by Establishment Industry.
  2. Source: PitchBook.
  3. Source: PitchBook Q1 2020 US PE Middle Market Report XLS.
  4. Source: Tree Line internal portfolio data.
  5. Source: Press releases and other publicly available information.
  6. Source: PitchBook.
  7. Source: Public filings.
  8. Source: PitchBook Q1 2020 US PE Middle Market Report XLS.
  9. Source: Public filings.
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognizing you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Please visit our privacy policy for more information regarding the personally identifiable information we collect and how it is used.